Louise Marie Thérèse Bathilde d’ Orléans, Duchess of Bourbon-Condé

by Karen-Claire Voss

Published in Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2004.

Bathilde d’Orléans was born in the château of Saint-Cloud just outside Paris. Her father was Louis-Phillipe d’Orléans, Duke of Orléans; her mother, Louise-Henriette de Bourbon, was the daughter of Louis-Armond II, Prince of Conti.  She was a cousin of Louis XVI and the aunt of Louis-Philippe, who was to become “Roi des Français” in 1830. Louise-Henriette died when Bathilde was nine. Three years later, the child was sent to school at the Convent de la Magdeleine de Trenel where she remained until 1769. It was there that she began to spend protracted periods in prayer and develop the spiritual tendencies that would characterize the rest of her life. In 1770, her father obtained a papal dispensation enabling her to marry her fourteen-year-old cousin, Louis-Henri-Joseph de Bourbon; thus, Bathilde became Duchess of Bourbon. In 1772, she gave birth to their only child, Louis-Antoine-Henri de Bourbon, the Duke of Enghien. During this period, her husband began a series of indiscreet affairs, some with women from Bathilde’s personal entourage. All her attempts to save the marriage failed. The couple was legally separated at the end of 1780, and her husband gained sole custody of their son, although Bathilde managed to retain the right to see him frequently. After the separation, Bathilde went to live with her father and his second wife, Madame de Montesson, in Saint-Assise, but her father soon gave her two residences of her own – the Hotel de Clermont in Paris and a summerhouse in Petitbourg. From this time on, her focus was definitively changed, and she consciously began to forge a new life for herself.

The three most important influences on Bathilde were Freemasonry, Christian Theosophy and animal magnetism. The participation of women from the high nobility in “Adoption Freemasonry” (so called because of its “adoption”, i.e. acceptance, of women as members) was common in this period and Bathilde entered Freemasonry in 1775 at the latest, joining the Masonic lodge Saint-Jean de la Candeur (established in 1775) in Paris. “Lodges of Adoption” had begun to appear in France in the 1740s; their members were therefore both men and women, but they were directed by men.  Saint-Jean de la Candeur was one of twelve Lodges of Adoption in Paris, and the foremost among them in terms of aristocratic recruitment (it was comprised mostly of people of high nobility). Bathilde was to be more than only one Sister among others: hardly had she entered Freemasonry when her brother, the Duke of Orléans, in his capacity (since 1771) of Grand Master of the Grande Loge of France, made her “Grande Maîtresse” of all the French lodges of Adoption. Once separated from her husband, she became an active Freemason, and at the same time, began to assemble a highly eclectic, sometimes politically controversial circle around herself.

The great Christian theosopher à Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin was an important influence as well; his Ecce Homo (1792) was written specifically for Bathilde. Along with other favorites, among them Franz Anton Mesmer and Bacon de la Chevalerie, he was installed from time to time at her château in Petitbourg, where her confessor Pierre Pontard celebrated mass. Saint-Martin was an intimate of à Jean-Baptiste Willermoz, who practiced mesmerism and was helped in deciphering the hieroglyphic messages he allegedly received from God by Saint-Martin. In striking contrast to Willermoz, however, Saint-Martin (described by one contemporary historian as a ‘metaphysical consultant to mesmerists’) sought to spiritualize mesmerist principles. He combined them with more mystical ideas because he thought mesmerism too materialistic and liable to make persons vulnerable to what he termed “astral intelligences”; it is against such “magical” practice that he wrote Ecce Homo. Bathilde’s closest friend was the Baroness d’Oberkirch of Strasbourg, who frequented mesmerist groups in Paris.

As early as 1789, Bathilde had espoused revolutionary ideas, along with her brother, Philippe Egalité, and around that time became involved with two other mystics, Suzette Labrousse and Cathérine Théot (the so-called “Mother of God”), who combined mysticism with political ideals. Bathilde underwrote the publication of Labrousse’s Journal Prophétique, containing prophecies and criticisms of the nobility and the clergy, and edited by Pierre Pontard.

She did a great deal of charitable work; e.g., in Petitbourg she founded a hospice, where frequently she personally attended to patients.  She also studied intensely, and produced two original works, including a book length study based on her experience of administering a fifteen-month long treatment of animal magnetism to a patient in Petitbourg, and her Opuscules. The latter contain an account of how she was attracted to the life of the spirit while young, was later led astray, and how, after her marriage ended, she sought out a confessor and renewed her interior journey. From that time on, it is clear that Bathilde conscientiously attended to the details of daily life simply because she believed them important to her spiritual well-being.  She believed that one always has a choice with respect to the quality with which one does even ordinary things, writing for example that ‘... at each moment we breathe and we are able to pump life or death by all the movements which constitute our physical, moral and spiritual being’. In the Introduction she says that on the advice of a ‘wise man’ (possibly Saint-Martin), she ‘abandoned herself to prayer . . . while practicing good works’. In a statement characteristic of her attitude, she writes:  ‘I received some inner illumination and consolation which detached me more and more from all of creation, in order to live only in and for God ... this precious pearl ... is enough ...’. According to her, it was Providence that had helped her to find the works of Mme. Guyon, which led her to the ‘heart of my religion’.  She regarded ‘all terrestrial nature’ as ‘an open book in which we can read the secrets of spiritual nature’, describes the passage of angelic spirits into human beings at the moment of our birth, and adopts the Christian theosophical idea that Adam was originally an androgynous being who was separated into two sexes as a result of original sin. The Opuscules contain an original and carefully elucidated articulation of the difference between the “visible” or “teaching” church and the “invisible” or “working” church. It must be noted that the term “interior Church” is never used by Saint-Martin nor by his friends, and first came into use in 1798 through the publication in French of Quelques traits de l’Eglise intérieure by à A.V. Lopuchin. Bathilde may have borrowed it from there. But quite as interestingly, Bathilde does give it a sense very different from Lopuchin’s: The visible Church is … in my view the schism which broke out since the Apostles, against the true interior Church which is almighty and all pure in the bosom of her divine Master’. Closely linked to this distinction is the one she makes between the “teaching church” and the “working church”: the former ‘is visible to the eyes of the body’, whereas the latter is visible ‘to the eyes of the soul’. She also says that once one ‘possesses the Word in one self’ one is enabled ‘to truly effect divine works’; here again, she shows she is more concerned with what one does than with what one says. 

Bathilde would not escape the wrath of the Revolution. Her wealth and property were confiscated; she was imprisoned in 1793, then released in 1795. Relegated to the provinces, she settled in Petitbourg, until a decree of exile in 1797, when she was banished to Spain.    Bathilde refers to a certain Ruffin as one of the guards who escorted her to the Spanish border, and writes that during the journey a great spiritual understanding sprung up between the two. The identity of this man, whom Bathilde usually addresses as ‘mon bon ange’, has never been definitively established. Two volumes of her voluminous correspondence are devoted to letters sent to him while she was in exile; they were published in 1812. 

Although Bathilde had been something of an accomplished harpist, it would appear that she later came to see music as a kind of indulgence: in one of her letters to Ruffin she strongly advises him to beware of music, because it ‘turns us away from the pure and saintly source’ and makes us ‘run the risk of losing precious time’. In these letters we can also read her theosophical interpretations of the Fall of Lucifer and Adam, her arithmological views, and quotations from various theosophers to be read by Ruffin; e.g., à Dutoit-Membrini and à William Law. She gives Ruffin her opinion about the French Revolution, which she saw as part of the workings ‘of the great machine of the universe’, a means for God to save ‘as many people as possible’; and using an almost alchemical image, she writes that ‘it is God who purifies the water, and who by his action on it liquefies all the parts’. Unwavering in her view of earthly trials as unimportant in the face of the heavenly future, she adapted to greatly reduced circumstances. Her life became become more embittered after her son, the Duke of Enghein (born in 1772), had been executed in 1804 upon an order given by Napoleon.  Finally granted permission by Napoleon to return to France, she went back to Paris in 1814, where she more or less reconstituted her old circle.  On January 10, 1822, she suffered a stroke and died later the same day.

Bathilde d’Orléans’ life and work is worth further study. The great historian Auguste Viatte may have been instrumental in creating the impression of Bathilde as being somewhat naive, almost certainly neurasthenic, and superficial. His account implicitly compares her to the “prudent” Saint-Martin, who warned her against over-involvement with somnambulists and advised her to abandon herself to prayer, Bible reading, and good works. While Viatte’s account is valuable inasmuch as she is otherwise neglected in the literature, delving deeper into the primary sources indicates she was more formidable than one might otherwise surmise. She undeniably deliberately and consciously attempted to embody her spiritual convictions, by trying to make what she said and did in daily life correspond to her spiritual convictions. 

Correspondence entre Mme de Bourbon et M. (Ruffein) sur leur expressions religieuses, 2 vols., Barcelona 1812. The second volume is entitled : Correspondance entre […] opinions religieuses et divers petits contes moraux de Madme de B[ourbon]. Opuscules ou Pensées d’une âme de foi sur la religion chrétienne pratiquée en esprit et en vérité, n.p. 1812. Le Propagateur du magnétisme animal, n.p., n.d.

Lit.: Janet Mackay Burke, Sociability, Friendship and the Enlightenment among Women Freemasons in Eighteenth-century France, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation: Arizona State University 1986. Ducos (Comte -), La mère du Duc d’Enghein, Plon: Paris 1900. Oberkirch, La baronne (baronne d’-), Mèmoires sur la cour de Louis XVI et la société française avant 1789,  Paris: Gratiot 1853. Auguste Viatte, Les sources occultes du romantisme (Illuminisme –Théosophie, 1770-1820) (1928), vol. I, repr. Champion: Paris 1965, esp. 238-245.

Karen-Claire Voss